Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts

Police Drama  

Posted by Benjie in , , ,

I've long been a fan of Police Drama. I like the mystery (that comes with shows like Columbo) and the police procedures. Understanding that shows like Hunter make us root for the officer who pushes the envelope in order to make the case. Any more, the newer police shows have the tendency to concentrate more on the officer (and his/her life) than the case--turning many of them into prime time soap opera a la NYPD Blue rather than the police procedural, or they concentrate on spinning off the name of another show (Law & Order, et.al.) with little or no connection to the original.


Because I like to read things like the 87th Precinct series, I like my TV Police shows to be well-written. Because I enjoy a well presented stage production, I enjoy the actors in these shows to know their craft. Setting aside my preference for Walker, Texas Ranger (writing and acting both fall short, but there are tons of great fight scenes thanks to Chuck Norris), I don't enjoy too many of the crime shows available for consumption these days. Friday evenings has become the exception, and I just finished watching two of the best examples:

  • CSI: NY -- while it is a name-copy series, and they have had some of the character-driven, soap opera-esque story lines, I have found them to be consistently well-written, and with a lead character played by veteran actor Gary Sinese you can't go wrong when you can settle in for an episode.
  • Blue Bloods -- I must admit that when it started a couple of seasons ago, I had my doubts. A family full of NY Police officers, headed by the commish himself? Bound to turn into dumpster diving into the tawdry lives of each separate character. Attempts at this very thing have been few and short-lived, because the family consistently focuses on the case. Another concern I had was Donnie Wahlberg in one of the chief roles, and I've been pleasantly surprised. The writers of this series have held to their guns with the character of the characters, the genuine faith of an Irish Catholic family of cops in New York (how's that for stereotyping?), and the commitment to family of the family. Plus you get to see them approach crime from a variety of viewpoints. 
For two well-written, well-acted Police Procedural Dramas, do your TV watching on Fridays--or set your TiVo--you don't really need any other shows.

Definitely a Guy Movie  

Posted by Benjie in , ,

Let's face it. Guys like movies with lots of pyrotechnics, gun fights, and car chases. This movie has all of that but little else. A bevy of action stars insures there will be plenty of fist fights, exploding bullets, and things blown up.

Mercenaries, led by Sylvester Stallone, take on a job offered by Bruce Willis (cameo) who represents the CIA (although this is just speculation), to rescue a small island nation from the American bad guy (Eric Roberts) backed dictator. The General's daughter is one of the leaders in the movement to rid the country of the tyranny.

The Blushing Bride (who enjoys a good action flick with me once in awhile) couldn't find the enjoyment in the exploding screen. My assessment--it was a good story, told badly with poor acting highlighted by some really great pyromania thrown in to appease the crowds.

Book 'im Dan-O  

Posted by Benjie in ,


I'm often skeptical at the "updating" of some of my favorites from the past. And there are some inconsistencies from what I remember in my childhood viewing. At the same time, some of the questions are being answered that were left unasked when Jack Lord led the Five-O team.


For instance, Danny is now a divorced father trying to build a relationship with his daughter (who lives with her mother and step-dad in Hawaii). Magarett himself is more rogue t
han I recall--made so by the opening story line from tonight's 'pilot' (I put it in quotations because I'm unsure whether it's really the pilot or not).

In its favor--the new version of Hawaii Five-O is filled with action, banter, and pyrotechnics. They decided not to keep the theme song (which is part of the draw of the show) with minimal updating. And they did not make the main characters the "sons" of or the "long lost relatives of" the original cast from the 70s.

So, welcome back Steve and Danny and Chin and the whole Five-O squad. I'm looking forward to it.

A Fine Review (or Two?)  

Posted by Benjie in ,

Check out the review of my first two novellas over at Coffeespoons.

Of Ads and Sugar and Personal Taste  

Posted by Benjie in ,

I was intrigued recently by a commercial blitz. It started with the Superbowl ads for Pepsi Max. You know the campaign—targeting real men with this “healthy” version of Pepsi-Cola. The big ad on Superbowl Sunday had men encountering outrageously harsh pain with the age-old statement “I’m all right!” (or some variation thereof). It says a lot about a man’s machismo if he can be hit in the head with a bowling ball and respond with “I’m okay”. My son understands this concept and, whenever he trips and falls, re-echos, “I’m okay! I meant to do that.” He’s been doing that since he was three.

So these ads – I especially like the one which claims that the can houses a nuclear reactor (or some such) and upon crushing it the guy says, “Hey, I just crushed a nuclear reactor.” [For those who have seen the ad more than once, don’t fill the comment section up with corrections to my memory, that’s not the point. I'm posting it here to avoid confusion.]

Now I’ve periodically tried diet sodas. They’re supposed to be better for you and all that. And any time that I have encountered the word “diet” in the title of something that’s not really all that good for me to begin with, I get suspicious. I’ve heard the mantra of the diet soda cult – “You can’t tell the difference!” (repeat four or five hundred times).

And now for the truth: Some of the drinks sold in the category known as “diet soda” do indeed taste worse than others. I recall a swig of Tab from years ago. That seared a memory that will forever be with me. I recall the days of Sugar Free Dr Pepper, and a taste test of Pepsi One (supposedly not a diet drink, but it had the same effect on me as Diet Pepsi, Diet Coke, and Diet Dr Pepper). The bottom line is that if a drink substitutes anything for the sugar or syrup that’s supposed to sweeten it; if the manufacturer tries to sell it with a “sugar free” tag-line – or even a “low sugar” tag line – the product will leave a taste in your mouth.

“You get used to it,” some of my friends argue – but if I have to get used to it, why would I want to drink it? As it is, I don’t drink that much soda anyway. I hear the same arguments about the use of certain artificial sweeteners, and “natural” sweeteners (you can’t tell the difference). But I have discovered that if it ain’t sugar, I can taste the difference. In fact, one popular sugar substitute today is made by changing the refining process for sugar (so it’s made out of sugar). I’m told that you can’t tell the difference when it is used – either by itself or mixed with sugar on the halvsies. But that’s a lie – you can tell the difference!

And so the point: The claim is that Pepsi Max is the kind of diet drink that real men can drink without fear of it being a sissy diet drink. So I had to try this new concoction. Who knows, maybe technology has found a way to make a low sugar drink drinkable. But alas, it has not happened. My advice to you, if you are not of the diet drink cult, and continue to taste the sugar substitute long after the drink is gone, don’t bother tasting this one. Great ad campaigns aside, Pepsi Max is just another in the long line of trying to get us to de-sugar our sugary drinks, and it tastes bad, too.

Here’s to you, Dr Pepper – and if anyone can find a bottle that’s sweetened properly with Imperial Pure Cane, send me some and I’ll be eternally grateful.

An Interesting Twist on an Old Favorite  

Posted by Benjie in , ,

Christmas 2007. My Blushing Bride knows that I like to play Monopoly®, but she can’t really stand the game. So what does she do? She finds this interesting item called “Make Your Own Opoly”. It’s loosely (really loosely) based on the classic game, but provides for the owner software and game pieces to build a game custom tailored to their life.

It took a year, but the result I got was Benj-Opoly. Players can travel around a board and “buy” significant places or memories from my life. Once bought, you can charge rent when opponents land on that particular square. There are spaces for my birthplace, my school years, colleges, significant employment events, and references to my love for reading and writing.

There are a few drawbacks in the design of the game itself—such as “play the lottery” squares, which don’t square with my life, and the “Chance” and “Community Chest” squares have been re-dubbed “Good News”/“Bad News” with a little leeway for personalization, but not enough. I’m working on making necessary adjustments to these as well. Enjoy the pictures. And have a great day.

Who I Am -- iPrayz (Review)  

Posted by Benjie in , , ,


I struggled to put a category on this album offered by the family praise group iPrayz. This collection features the voices of three members of the group. Husband and wife Eric and Jennifer Hagen and Amy Propst (whose husband Perry has worked as the groups worship painter and technical director) almost deliver a sound that is country with hints of bluegrass, but not really either of those. I was introduced to the group at a recent meeting hosted by our church. Live they show just as much enthusiasm for the music and the message as you hear on the CD.

Featured on this album is a mix of excellent new worship songs penned by Amy and Eric and sometimes coupled with some of the great old hymns of the faith. The title cut is a fine example of the voicing and the message of the group. Their arrangement of Fanny J. Crosby's old standard "Blessed Assurance" is top-notch.

You can order this from iPrayz's website or from Amazon.com. You won't be disappointed.

I rate this album with 4 out of 5 discs.

The Andromeda Strain -- A Review  

Posted by Benjie in , ,

I will admit that I haven't read this

Nor have I seen this

But the last two evenings my Blushing Bride and I have enjoyed this newer (mini series) version of Crichton's thriller. We decided to watch part 1 yesterday and were hooked. Benjamin Bratt puts in a stellar performance as Jeremy Stone (leader of the Wildfire team) that carries the mediocrity of the other members of the Wildfire team (Ricky Shroder still has his best work in Silver Spoons) as well as the lackluster presidential portrayal.

The writing keeps you on the edge of your seat even if the acting doesn't. Go ahead waste four hours with this one. You'll enjoy it.

Mr. Bean's Holiday -- Review  

Posted by Benjie in , ,


Last night, the Blushing Bride and I sat down to enjoy this gem birthed out of British Comedy. I've always liked Bean, his nine year old trapped in a thirty-year-old body antics are consistently endearing. In my opinion, Bean is by far Rowan Atkinson's best character (although he did put in a sleeper of a performance in The Rat Race).

Mr. Bean's Holiday is good but not spectacular. The Bean character tends to get slow after about twenty minutes, so an hour and a half can drag at times. So on to the highlights--

Mr. Bean wins the raffle of a holiday trip to Cannes. Along the way he stumbles into an expensive (but grotesque) meal, a taxi ride to the opposite end of Paris, but with the help of his trusty compass walks across the city (in a straight line--through traffic), and all in his happily oblivious state.

Bean meets and befriends a young Russian boy, whose father is in Cannes to help judge the film festival, and an aspiring actress who doesn't understand how short her career is . . . until she meets Bean. And all Mr. Bean wants to do is get to the beach (losing his money and his passport along the way).

Especially entertaining to me was getting to hear the little boy speak in slow clear Russian -- I was kind of homesick for the former Soviet Union. The plot was okay, but slow-moving. There was plenty of entertainment for about twenty minutes of Bean-esque fun. Die-hard fans of Atkinson or Mr. Bean will want to get a copy of this, others will want to take a pass.

The North Avenue Irregulars -- A Review  

Posted by Benjie in ,


Walt Disney had a winner with this quirky little film. You can tell from the first scene that the movie is vintage 1979. The fashion statements as well as the language is reminiscent of old-form Disney--Dean Jones' Herbie saga, The Apple Dumpling Gang offerings, and the like. You can't beat the campy opening scene where Delaney (Douglas F0wley) gets knocked out of the church belfry he's in the process of painting.


The story line tells all about the haphazard way that the Rev. Mike Hill (Edward Herrmann), single father and new parish pastor of the North Avenue Presbyterian Church, literally falls into his new position. While trying to involve the people in the everyday operation of the church, he entrusts church funds to one of the families who promptly lose the money betting on a longshot. The bulk of the movie shows how a group of ladies from the church work with Treasury Department agents and their pastor to catch the bosses of the gambling ring.


Classic clothing, nostalgic cars, and a demolition derby-style chase scene highlight this romping good time. Featured is a cast of the near-famous, including Karen Valentine, Cloris Leachman, Ruth Buzzy, and Alan Hale, Jr.


What speaks the loudest in the movie is not the comedy based on the attempts to moralize a small community, but the eerily true-to-life approach of a young minister to bring life into a stagnant church--including letting the church membership be involved in the goings on of the church and enlisting the help of a "rockin' hip band" to liven up the drab music during worship.


This movie is good for a trip to a time when censors had a say in comic movies, and those who have a view to church life with a twist of humor. The North Avenue Irregulars gets three out of five thumbs. Put it in your queue for an hour and a half of good clean fun.

The Bucket List, a review  

Posted by Benjie in ,


Yes, you're right, this is a movie about dying. It's also a comedy--and it does both really well. Not only has Rob Reiner cast talented veteran actors (Jack Nicholson and Morgan Freeman) in the title roles, but he's also chosen a script that does a difficult topic right.


How are you supposed to deal with the news that you have cancer--and it's probably not going to get better? You laugh, you cry, you get angry. You do everything except for lie there and let it take you. That is the approach that Edward (Nicholson) and Carter (Freeman) take. Starting from a freshman philosophy professor's assignment to Carter some forty years ago, to list the things they want to do before they "kick the bucket", the two older gentlemen (who meet only because they find themselves in the same hospital room because of their cancer diagnoses) set out to . . . sky-dive, drive fast sports cars, see the world, and conquer the mountain.


The Bucket List gives the viewer an opportunity to join in this final journey, and becomes a touchstone for thought in the process. Carter, the mechanic who never finished his college education, proves to be rather deep as well as intellectual as he beats all the contestants to the right answers while watching Jeopardy! on television. Self-made multi-millionaire Edward proves to be the fool who learns deeper things while trying to cheer up his new friend. The movie and the premise seem to be surface much like the character of Edward. But viewers will laugh and even cheer as they discover the layers of depth in both the story and the characters. Questions of faith and philosophy are presented with eloquence and feeling in this excellent movie. The only drawback is the lack of development in all but one of the supporting characters. I couldn't put my finger on whether it was the fault of the writers or the actors (or a joint effort).


Beware, viewer, as with any movie dealing with the emotional rollercoaster of incurable disease, tissues will be necessary, if for no other scene than the one where Edward gets to cross off "kiss the most beautiful girl in the world" from the List. A task that trailers show Freeman saying, "How do you intend to accomplish that?" to which Nicholson replies with a smile, "Volume." Go see this one, it's worth the price (including the overpriced snacks). Of course you could wait until it comes out in video, but you'll miss out on some really good cinema. I'm glad my blushing bride wanted to see this one, and that I was able to find childcare and a theater to surprise her with it. You'll want to do so soon--in a theater near you. (Five out of five thumbs)


My wife and I had been wanting to see this movie based on a novel based on a biblical story of the rise of Esther, Queen of Persia. I had heard good things about the book, and subsequently the movie. I’d even put the book (Haddasah by Tommy Tenney) on my “possibilities” list. After all, I like a good story taken from the Scripture and fictionalized to bring it to life for the modern reader. And the story of Esther is a GOOD story.

The movie itself could be great. There are no instances that I recall of vocabulary limited to vulgarity and swearing. There are no gratuitous sex scenes. And there is no unnecessary violence. (Even though the background story would allow all of these objectional materials.) All in all it is just the type of movie that family-oriented viewers has been calling for over a vast number of years. So what happens?

The plot is disjointed, the acting mediocre at best, and the retelling of the story of Esther removes all the best parts of the biblical story. Perhaps Tenney forgot to read the biblical account before penning his novel, perhaps the screen writers were just unfamiliar with the story of Esther and Mordecai and Xerxes and Haman, but the leaps which remove the power of faith and courage are missing in the movie. The villain Haman is characterized as one of the stronger characters in the story, and the ultimate irony so prevalent in the scripture is all but absent in this rendering of the story.

Bottom line, if you liked the story of Esther, this is a good movie to skip.

The Bourne Ultimatum – A Review  

Posted by Benjie in ,



Against the advice of my brother (“You will probably want to see the first two in order to fully enjoy this one”) the blushing bride and I got sitters for the kids and took in the latest chapter in Bourne movies. I’ll admit it: I’m a sucker for action movies. As a matter of fact if you have fight scenes, chase scenes, and blow things up, I’m there!

Jason Bourne continues to have flashbacks that give him clues to who he really is. The problem is that the clues are extremely vague. Picking up news items that lead him to the explanation of the flashbacks—gleaning names and information along the way—Bourne travels all over the world, encountering new and old faces along the way.

Although I’ve seen snips of both of the earlier Bourne films, I still have a hard time casting Matt Damon in an action role. I must admit that he gives a surprisingly good rendition of an indestructible black-ops assassin who is bent on self-destruction through self-discovery. He is helped along the way by Nicky Parsons (Julia Stiles) and the ever present Pam Landy (Joan Allen). By the end of the movie, Bourne has a new name to claim, and a new outlook on life. The film leaves a wide berth for the possibility of the return of Bourne although it will be necessary for writers to dig deep for plot development.

For your dollar, this is a great action movie with lots of speed and destruction. The fight scenes are fast-paced, the chases high-speed, and there are a fair amount of gun-play and pyrotechnics to satisfy. Go see it on the big screen if it’s still playing in your town.

The Bourne Ultimatum gets 4 thumbs and makes me want to rent The Bourne Identity and The Bourne Supremacy.

A Mediocre-ly Good Book  

Posted by Benjie in , ,


Last week I posted a quote from this book. Now I've finished reading the book. You can read my review here or here. Mims has produced a book that has some value--mainly as companion to Rainer & Geiger's Simple Church (which was published three years after this book). In The Kingdom-Focused Church, Mims hits several good points. These points stand out amidst the repetative nature of the book. As one reviewer on Amazon.com put it the book is "Good . . . but nothing new." He even quotes from Mims in saying "It is not likely that I have said much in this book that is new to you" (p. 179).

Don't let this weakness keep you from reading the book, though--it could possibly be the reminder that you need to FOCUS.

Surprised by the Bridge  

Posted by Benjie in ,


Recently I finished a re-read of Bridge to Terabithia by Katherine Paterson. I was touched, moved, and awed as usual by the great weaving of a tale of friendship, growing up, and creativity. (Read my review of the book here.) I re-read the book in anticipation of renting the new movie that has just been released on DVD.

I must admit that I was a bit skeptical about the movie. After all, the previews prepared viewers for an all-out fantasy on the lines of the recent release of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. In reading the book, I was reminded that the focus of the story was on the lives of Jess and Leslie, two fifth-graders (one a shy, boy who hid his talent because of a fear of being labeled a sissy; the other the new-comer whose family has moved out of the city to get away from all the materialism there). The story introduces us to the mystical, magical land of Terabithia, but very rare are the scenes from within the land. So, one can see how previews showing only scenes from the make-believe land would cause me alarm. (Perhaps the people at Disney think that the compelling images that are actually true to the book would not create interest in this highly acclaimed story.)

What I found was that the book had been produced for the screen more than once. I arrived home with Terabithia in tow and sat down with the big bowl of popcorn and a readiness to be overwhelmed. In 1985, PBS produced a made-for-tv version that flashed onto the screen. The script was fairly true to the story with the major exception of Annette O’Toole playing a character that combined the crabby fifth-grade teacher, Mrs. Myers, with the beautiful and inspiring music teacher, Miss Edmunds. I’m still unsure how the screenwriters came up with that one. The acting was so poor in this version that even though it seemed to follow the story line fairly well, I was falling asleep. Besides, I was wanting to watch the new Disney version. So . . . back to the video store for a trade.

What I then found was an engaging visual interpretation of Bridge to Terabithia. There were enough alterations that I was inclined to say that the movie was not really based on the book, but enough similarities that I felt I should let it go. The updating from the mid-70s to the early 21st century were handled well, but unnecessary in my opinion. The acting and the presentation were miles above the 1985 attempt at dramatizing the book. All in all, I found a movie that held merits on its own, let alone the connection to the Newbury Medal-winning book. At this point it is time to say, “Read the book, it’s better,” because that is what you’re always supposed to say. However, I believe that the two can co-exist happily this time. I prefer some of the nuances of the book, but was thrilled at the fantasy scenes provided by the movie (yes, the same ones that caused my initial concern about the movie). Where the book alludes to the forays into Terabithia itself, the movie takes you there. The result, you get the best of both worlds.

In today’s case, read the book or watch the movie, you’ll enjoy both. If you have time read the book and watch the movie, you won’t have to substitute either for the other.

Beware the Book Site, Though!  

Posted by Benjie in , , ,

Online Dating

Mingle2 - Online Dating



I review lots of books at Book 'em Benj-O, including mystery novels. That earned me the rights to a "more mature" rating for the review site.

Family Fun Time  

Posted by Benjie in , ,


Fundex has created a game that is fun for the whole family: the Peanut Butter & Jelly card game. It comes packaged in a miniature metal lunch box style container and is recommended for 2 to 4 players ages 4 and up.

We’ve enjoyed playing even with our three-year-old. The object of the game is to build three sandwiches using cards: bread, then peanut butter (or jelly), then jelly (or peanut butter), and topped by another bread card. If you can’t draw the exact card you need you may have an “ant” card that allows you to steal from someone else’s sandwich the part you need. But beware, someone may play the dreaded “fly” card that will stop your sandwich building progress.

The game comes complete with giant plastic fly to move from sandwich to sandwich. A great game that’s fun for everyone.

Spiderman 3 – A Review  

Posted by Benjie in , ,


Tobey Maguire is back, and this time he’s wearing black. My bride and I were able to join a roomful of junior high students as the third installment of the Spiderman movie franchise opened in our county seat.

This outing starts with our friendly neighborhood alter-ego, Peter Parker, dispelling with extra syrup how great it is to be Spiderman. New York loves him, he’s doing well at school, and he’s in love with his girlfriend. Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) has landed a role on Broadway, and everything is right. Peter is even planning the perfect date on which to ask MJ to marry him.

Things seem to turn upside down when a mysterious black ooze gets into the Spidey suit and magnifies Pete’s desire for revenge. The movie is one about choices—good and bad—and how they affect our lives and the lives of those around us. Thomas Haden Church does an excellent job in his role as the petty thief who really pulled the trigger in Uncle Ben’s murder. His transformation into the Sandman is one of the highlights of the movie. James Franco reprises his role as Harry Osborn, intent on avenging his father by killing Spiderman. And Eddie Brock (That 70s Show’s Topher Grace) makes an excellent self-absorbed anti-hero. Throughout the movie it seems that his sole purpose in life is to undermine Peter Parker.

I had a good time at the movies, enjoying most of the fare. One thing that is a struggle for the movie itself is the explanation of the ooze that turns Spidey dark and eventually turns Eddie into Venom. But the cameo by Stan Lee more than makes up for it.